By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The speaking style is formal and respectful, addressing both the presiding officer and the rapporteur with deference. The approach is logical and question-oriented, focusing on the procedural deficiencies in the preparation of the draft bill and on economic solutions. The tone is one of concern, but it remains measured.

The rhetorical style is concerned, critical, and urgent, employing emotional appeals (e.g., "broken families," "the whole society groans") to emphasize the social harm. The speaker presents their concern in the form of a question, addressing the Prime Minister directly to highlight the seriousness of the problem.

The rhetorical style is formal and direct. Although it begins with an acknowledgment of the presentation ("vigorous and inspiring optimism"), it quickly becomes demanding. The speaker presents a logical, political problem and rejects a potential bureaucratic response ("don't tell me this falls under the Digital Minister's authority"), insisting on a concrete solution.

The speaker’s style is formal, critical, and emphasizes moral justice, utilizing strong expressions such as "a question of justice" and criticizing the opponents’ "obstinacy." He balances logical arguments (referencing the Chancellor of Justice and committee votes) with emotional appeals (highlighting the vital necessity of a car for rural people). He also emphasizes the need for better mutual listening within the chamber.

The style is direct, demanding, and critical, emphasizing that the responses have remained incomplete. The speaker poses straightforward questions regarding specific steps and employs logical argumentation, referencing previous real-world practice ("this has actually occurred in life before") in support of their proposal.

The speaker's style is professional and critical, posing direct, practical questions to the ministers and presenters. The tone is concerned and demanding, particularly regarding the resolution of social issues (healthcare, special care facilities), stressing logical arguments about the economical use of state funds.