By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The style is generally constructive and appreciative of the ministers, but it becomes urgent and critical when addressing systemic problems (such as loan bottlenecks and public transport issues). Both logical arguments (numbers, laws, strategy documents) and emotional metaphors and references (e.g., "goldfish," "Robin Hood," "South-Estonian Paralympics") are used to emphasize the necessity of taking responsibility.

The tone is respectful, addressing the Minister directly, but it contains strong emotional appeals ("it makes the heart ache," "it causes great concern") regarding the taxation of classic vehicles. Rhetorical questions are employed to challenge the government's severity ("Why does Estonia feel the need to be slightly stricter?"), and the necessity of uniting the community and the state is emphasized.

The style is formal, addressing the Chair and the Minister, and constructive. The speaker starts by expressing gratitude, recognizing the existing good cooperation, before presenting concerns regarding shortcomings. A logical appeal is utilized, focusing on procedural problems and requesting solutions from the Minister to improve collaboration.