By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas
Total Sessions: 4
Fully Profiled: 4
2024-02-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speakers employ different rhetorical styles: one speaker uses a provocative and accusatory tone, asking why the opponents are afraid, and employing strong metaphors ("mafia-like"). The second speaker is formal, analytical, and well-argued, relying on historical facts and legal logic to justify their faction's opposition.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is formal and analytical, respectfully addressing the chairperson of the session and the rapporteur. The speaker presents their views directly, employing logical arguments concerning regulatory overreach, and concludes with a question aimed at finding solutions to market problems.
2024-02-14
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, employing logical arguments and referencing specific financial forecasts. The tone is skeptical regarding the economic impact of the tax bill, becoming worried and cautionary when the discussion touches upon the subject of national defense and irrationality.
2024-02-13
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The style is formal and respectful (addressing the Chair and the Minister), while the substance is pressing and demanding. The speaker poses direct questions aimed at securing specific information regarding the operational readiness of the European partners.