By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

Speakers are expressing strong opposition to the draft bill that would ban electoral alliances in local elections, viewing it as an attack on fair competition and democratic principles. Their stance is value-based, emphasizing the representation of the people's will and the protection of local autonomy. One speaker even framed the bill as outright "mafia-like" and driven by fear, while another called it a "pathetic move" by the political parties.

The most prominent issue is state over-regulation, which the speaker views as overly proactive and where he sees significant room for improvement. He also voices concern regarding the effect of tax hikes on rising prices and the resulting lack of market competition. The political position is focused on enhancing the business environment and analyzing how the market operates, with a strong emphasis on regulatory relief.

The political stance is clearly in opposition to the government's proposed tax bill, particularly concerning the registration fee and the taxation of vehicles with suspended registration status. This opposition targets both the economic rationale (specifically, the overestimation of projected revenues) and security concerns, emphasizing the potential value of these vehicles during a crisis. They maintain a strongly critical line regarding the bill's economic and security implications.

The political focus is on international security and bringing a swift end to the war in Ukraine. The speaker adopts a strong, values-based stance, stressing that Russia’s military objectives in Ukraine must never be accepted. This position is geared towards assessing the readiness of European partners and facilitating rapid action.