By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The speaker is actively addressing the issue of revoking voting rights from stateless persons. The political stance is geared toward clarifying the rationale behind the draft bill and the problems it aims to solve, suggesting a critical or scrutinizing approach to the proposed amendment. The focus is on the substance of the policy and the justification for its necessity.

The political emphasis is placed on social well-being and security, stressing that subsistence is an integral part of security. The speaker sharply criticizes the current welfare benefits, noting they fail to cover basic expenses, and demands concrete additional measures from the government. The focus is on performance and policy deficiencies that have driven people to the brink of collapse.

The speaker offers moderate support for the substance of the draft bill, deeming it necessary, but strongly criticizes the manner in which it is being handled, arguing that this approach is causing societal division. A key value-based position is the necessity of processing legislation in a more collaborative way to avoid public polarization. Furthermore, sensitivity regarding Ukraine’s struggle for freedom is highlighted.

The political focus is heavily centered on national defense and the rapid procurement of weaponry. This involves criticizing the government’s performance for inefficiency, citing expert evaluations. The speaker is demanding fundamental changes in defense sector methodologies and supports revoking the voting rights of citizens from aggressor states. These stances are strongly results-driven and security-oriented.

The most crucial issue is the fairness and structure of political party funding. The speaker challenges the current system, which relies solely on the number of seats held in the Riigikogu (Parliament), and proposes a value-based reform that would better account for both fixed operating costs and membership numbers, thereby ensuring a more accurate representation of different ideologies. The stance is moderately reformist and value-driven.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the proposed motor vehicle tax bill, particularly due to its rigidity and lack of differentiation. This position is policy-based, stressing the necessity of protecting families with children living in sparsely populated areas, who are being treated unfairly by the current tax burden. The speaker emphasizes the need to learn from previous political mistakes and implement corrective amendments.

The political focus is on the sustainability of salaries for academic staff and Research and Development (R&D). This position is performance-oriented, directly linking faculty salaries to young people's career choices and future economic growth. The issue has been presented to the Prime Minister, indicating a demand for accountability regarding the government's policies.