By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, employing strong language such as "tax orgy" and leveling accusations of incompetence. The speaker utilizes complex analogies (investment funds) and rhetorical questions to offset the presentation of economic data with pointed attacks. He employs irony, suggesting that ministers might face lifelong debt if their salaries were tied to actual economic performance.

The rhetorical style is highly combative and critical, employing sharp metaphors such as "tax orgy" and accusing the government of spreading "fake news," referencing Orwell's *1984*. The tone is one of concern and accusation, primarily emphasizing social injustice and economic deterioration. Both logical arguments (economic recession) and emotional appeals (the pensioner's 15 euros) are utilized.

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and at times sarcastic, especially regarding the naming of taxes (with the suggestion to call the tax the "Reform Party Incompetence Tax"). Direct and challenging questions are employed to dispute the opposing side's positions, and the necessity of honesty before the public is underscored. The style is formal, yet it incorporates emotional elements, such as the expression of shock concerning a colleague's vote.