By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, employing emotional appeals to highlight social injustice and the government's cynicism. Figurative language is utilized—such as "steamrolling over" and "callously stripping away"—alongside sarcasm ("as good Annely pointed out") to critique the coalition's procedures and motives. The tone is appropriate for a formal session, yet the content is polemical and accusatory.

The rhetorical style is direct, demanding, and slightly confrontational, particularly when the speaker feels they are not receiving a response. They utilize logical appeals and specifically reference the text of the draft bill to substantiate their positions. The speaker is highly persistent, emphasizing the necessity of receiving answers to their questions.