Session Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
2024-10-23
Political Position
The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance regarding the government's economic performance, stressing that the Estonian economy is the only one in Europe currently shrinking and ranks second globally in terms of decline, trailing only Haiti. The criticism is clearly performance-based, calling into question the suitability of the Minister of Finance for the post and referencing a pending motion of no confidence. The political focus is centered on holding the government accountable for this economic failure.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in macroeconomics and public finance, utilizing comparative data regarding Estonia's economic recession within the European and global context. They reference earlier forecasts from the Ministry of Finance and analyze the causes of the downturn (export partners, the war in Ukraine), disputing the logic of the opponent's explanations. A key emphasis is placed on the idea that the outcome is more important than intent or experience.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is critical, challenging, and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and factual results. The speaker employs rhetorical questions to highlight the opponent's responsibility and inconsistencies, such as why other countries' economies are not declining under the influence of the same factors. The tone is formal and direct, avoiding emotional appeals and focusing strictly on economic indicators.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active at the Riigikogu plenary session, directly participating in the debate related to the motion of no confidence against the Minister of Finance and asking questions. This pattern of activity indicates an opposition role, where attempts are made to hold members of the government accountable.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is directed at the Minister of Finance (Jürgen) and, more broadly, the Reform Party. The criticism is sharp and focuses on political accountability, citing the lack of economic results and quoting Andrus Ansip, who linked the decline to the Reform Party's competence. The opponent's actions are assessed as incompetent because the decline is unique in Europe.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Lack of data. The speaker operates strictly in an oppositional, questioning role; there is no reference to cooperation or compromises.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is heavily on the national economy and international comparisons, highlighting Estonia's position in the European and global economic decline rankings (Haiti). There is a lack of attention paid to specific Estonian regional issues or constituencies.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker deems economic growth and positive results (outcome) crucial, sharply criticizing the current economic downturn and the government's inadequate forecasts. They emphasize that for the Minister of Finance, the result is more important than intent or passion, and they doubt the government's capacity to lead the economy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Lack of data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary focus is on government accountability and parliamentary oversight, exemplified by the questions surrounding the motion of no confidence against the Minister of Finance in the Riigikogu. The speaker is directly involved in assessing the activities of the executive branch within the legislative assembly.
2 Speeches Analyzed