Agenda Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
Interpellation regarding the incompatibility of the motor vehicle tax with European Union law (No. 622)
2024-04-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy and economic management, accusing the Reform Party of creating an economic downturn and chaos. The speaker objects to the car tax, arguing that it disproportionately affects the poorest citizens and those living in rural areas, and proposes implementing a bank tax as an alternative. The framework of this position is clearly performance-driven, focusing on the government's failure to manage the economy effectively.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in macroeconomics and fiscal policy, referencing IMF forecasts regarding Estonia's economic downturn within the European context. Specific financial data is utilized regarding banks' quarterly profits (nearly half a billion), and the Lithuanian solidarity tax model is mentioned as an alternative revenue stream.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, expressing "very great and deep concern" regarding the government's actions. It employs both logical argumentation based on economic data and an emotional appeal focusing on social justice, stressing that the car tax targets ordinary people. The tone is formal, yet it includes direct accusations leveled at the Prime Minister for causing the economic recession.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The address is being delivered during an interpellation within a sitting of the Riigikogu, which points to active participation in the parliament's oversight mechanisms. The speaker references a recent interview with former colleague Andrus Ansip, demonstrating involvement in the current political discourse outside the chamber.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the Reform Party and its prime minister, who are directly blamed for causing the economic recession and mismanaging the country. The criticism is intense, focusing on both policy and results, stressing that the Reform Party is incompetent in running the state and therefore constitutes a "common problem." No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, a change in policy is being demanded.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data. The speaker is using criticism leveled at the government by former colleague Andrus Ansip to support their arguments, but there is no mention of current cooperation or willingness to compromise with other factions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national economic problems, but the negative impact of the car tax on people living in rural areas and large families is highlighted. This demonstrates concern for specific communities and their way of life.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Strongly supports progressive taxation and the redistribution of income, advocating for the introduction of a bank tax (solidarity tax) designed to generate one billion euros annually. It opposes the car tax and the abolition of the tax hump, arguing that these measures harm low-income individuals while the government hands out money to the wealthy. It demonstrates a clear preference for protecting the interests of labor and the poor over those of the financial sector.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It focuses on social justice and economic inequality, protecting the poorest individuals and large families from the government’s tax policies. Social concern is closely tied to economic policy, emphasizing that government measures specifically target the most vulnerable.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the opposition to the proposed car tax, which is a planned government initiative. Alternative priorities suggested include the introduction of a bank tax (or solidarity tax) and the reversal of the abolition of the so-called "tax hump." The speaker positions himself as a staunch opponent of the government’s tax policy initiatives.
3 Speeches Analyzed