Agenda Profile: Andrei Korobeinik
Draft law amending the State Budget Act (511 SE) - First Reading
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The politician strongly supports the goal of increasing budget transparency but sharply criticizes the government's actual activities and the inconsistencies in implementing the draft legislation. The main focus is on defending the role of the Riigikogu (Parliament) and the government's capacity to present a trustworthy and realistic budget overview. The political framework is results-oriented, concentrating on the government's failure to deliver the promised transparency.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a detailed understanding of state budget procedures and substance, pointing out contradictions between the explanatory memorandum and the minister's answers. Specifically, he shows expertise in addressing the concrete figures related to public transport subsidies and cuts (e.g., 10 million, a 6 million cut, a 30 million covert agreement). He uses technical terminology to call into question the fidelity of the budget details to reality.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is analytical and critical, emphasizing logical inconsistencies and procedural integrity, even though it opens with an optimistic introduction. The speaker employs rhetoric to defend the quality of parliamentary debate, questioning the consistency of the minister's statements and his respect for colleagues. The focus lies on logical argumentation and verification of facts, not emotional persuasion.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively participating in the Riigikogu session, posing consecutive questions to the minister during the first reading of the bill. He/She emphasizes his/her continuous presence in the chamber ("I have been in this hall since the very beginning"). This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on parliamentary work and government oversight.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is directed at the actions of the government and its ministers, criticizing both the lack of transparency in the budget and the minister's unethical conduct in parliament. The criticism is intense, focusing on the contradictory nature of the minister's statements and the calling of a Member of Parliament's question "stupid." The attacks are both political (budget inaccuracies) and procedural/personal (the minister's integrity).
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker refers positively and appreciatively to colleagues (Anastassia, Lauri, Vadim Belobrovtsev), confirming that others have raised similar or related questions. This indicates collaboration with other members of parliament who share concerns regarding budget transparency and the minister's conduct. Cooperation with the government is not mentioned.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is indirect, centering on the public transport budget and subsidies, which are crucial for ensuring regional infrastructure and services. He/She cites, for example, the public transport budget cuts and hidden agreements introduced by the Minister of Regional Affairs. Specific regions or local projects are not named.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The politician strongly emphasizes fiscal transparency and demands that the budget reflect the real situation, criticizing hidden agreements and inaccurate data. He expresses concern about public transport cuts, which indicates a desire to maintain essential public services, while simultaneously demanding strict budgetary discipline and accountability.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on the draft Act amending the State Budget Act (511 SE), regarding which clarity is being demanded concerning its effective date (this year or next) and its overall transparency. The speaker adopts the position of a critical scrutinizer, demanding precise clarification of the financial details of the draft and ensuring the Riigikogu (Parliament) retains its right to participate in the decision-making process.
3 Speeches Analyzed