Agenda Profile: Andrei Korobeinik

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's economic policy, particularly concerning the car tax and the hike in VAT. The primary emphasis is placed on identifying alternative revenue streams, such as taxing banks' excessive profits, in order to mitigate the economic recession. The political framework is distinctly results-oriented, criticizing the government's failed economic policies and the resulting economic decline. Furthermore, protecting the rights of the opposition during the proceedings of the Riigikogu is a crucial topic.

The expert knowledge is focused on finance and banking policy, providing specific figures regarding the potential revenue from the bank tax (400–500 million euros) and citing the Lithuanian precedent. They also possess a thorough understanding of the Riigikogu's Rules of Procedure and Internal Rules, which they repeatedly utilize to challenge the actions of the presiding officer. Furthermore, they have expertise in the taxation of the digital economy (digital services tax) and the Platform Work Directive.

The speaking style is predominantly combative and critical, and the speaker often expresses indignation and protest regarding the violation of the opposition's rights. Both logical arguments are employed (referencing specific sections of the law) and emotional appeals (for example, the protection of children's school lunches and people with disabilities). The style is very direct, repeatedly issuing personal challenges to the session chair and accusing the coalition of arbitrary rule.

The speaker is highly active in Riigikogu sessions, constantly submitting interpellations (to Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, and Ministers Riina Sikkut and Tiit Riisalo) and initiating draft resolutions. Their pattern of activity is intense, focusing on major legislative topics (the car tax, the budget) and raising procedural questions directed at the presiding officer of the session. They actively participate in committee work, even though they claim their rights are being violated there.

The confrontation is intense and is aimed squarely at the government (the Government of the Republic) and the coalition (the Reform Party, Estonia 200), accusing them of failed economic policy and violating parliamentary rules of procedure. Criticism is particularly sharp regarding the Riigikogu Board (the Parliament’s management), who are accused of restricting the rights of the opposition and launching a "political steamroller" (for example, by prioritizing bills for the agenda based on party affiliation). The attacks are primarily procedural and political, leveling accusations of undemocratic behavior against their opponents.

The cooperation within the Center Party faction is strong regarding the submission of bills and interpellations. He/She proposes colleagues from other factions (e.g., Aivar Kokk, Annely Akkermann) for appointment to international posts. In terms of opposition cooperation, he/she supports amendments put forward by other factions (e.g., Isamaa) which offer alternatives to the government’s taxation policies.

The primary focus is national and international, covering the Estonian economy, the budget, and European Union directives (such as the Platform Work Directive). There is also mention of major national projects that the government has failed to deliver on (the Haapsalu railway, the Tallinn Hospital).

The economic views are strongly focused on taxing the super-profits of the banking sector (a solidarity tax, estimated at 400–500 million euros) in order to avoid taxing ordinary people (through measures like the car tax or VAT increases). The party advocates taking money from those who have it and supports the implementation of a digital services tax. He/She criticizes the government’s plans to freeze wages and eliminate benefits for single pensioners.

It focuses on social welfare issues, such as increasing the school lunch allowance and ensuring tax concessions for disabled people and large families concerning the car tax. It also submits an inquiry regarding Estonia's drug policy, citing the growing drug use and death toll among young people.

Legislative priorities include initiating bills for the bank tax and the digital services tax to provide alternative funding sources for the budget. A significant focus is on opposing the car tax and submitting related amendments, particularly ensuring tax exemptions based on the proposals put forward by the Chancellor of Justice. He is also active in initiating drafts of procedural decisions (e.g., the formation of the Nordica investigative committee).