By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The rhetorical style is very demanding, repetitive, and confrontational, focusing on naming specific names. The speaker uses accusatory language ("deceitful energy policy") and hints at hidden activity, a conflict of interest, or lining someone's pockets. He attempts to exert procedural pressure by asking the presiding officer for the opportunity to repeat the question until an answer is obtained.

The style is concerned and direct, emphasizing the need for swift action because the damages are extensive and the public's sense of security has taken a serious blow. Both logical arguments (population figures, the precise wording of the legislative amendment) and emotional examples (the mauling of dogs and sheep right on private property) are employed. The speaker also uses colloquial expressions, such as "a disservice" (karuteene) and "taking things too far" (vint üle keeratakse), to warn against excessive regulation.

The rhetorical style is critical, demanding, and concerned, highlighting the injustice and sheer illogicality of political decisions. Specific examples and comparisons (such as the neighbor's car) are employed as an emotional appeal to highlight the public's confusion and sense of unfair treatment.

The rhetorical style is formal, yet highly forceful and confrontational, employing intense criticisms such as "fundamentally wrong" and "totally unacceptable." The speaker addresses the public directly and stresses logical argumentation, while admonishing the coalition to "come to its senses."

The rhetorical style is highly aggressive, confrontational, and ironic, utilizing counter-attacks (such as calling the government a "flying circus"). The focus is on directly questioning the Prime Minister, implying incompetence and corruption. The tone is formal, but the content is sharp and demanding.