By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

Total Sessions: 8

Fully Profiled: 8

2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker supports cutting state expenditures by abolishing the expense allowances for Riigikogu members. He/She criticizes the government’s actions concerning the draft car tax bill and the withdrawal of child benefits from large families.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
There is insufficient data.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
It strongly supports tax relief for consumers, calling for a reduction in VAT on food items to ease the heavy burden of high grocery costs on families. It views this as the bare minimum required to improve the economic situation and support people's ability to cope.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The speaker opposes tax increases (VAT) and unfunded mandates that strain local budgets, pushing them into deficit. The inclusion of state financial resources is demanded to ensure the financial stability of local governments and their ability to fulfill their obligations.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize the need for stability and predictability, opposing new taxes and continuous reform. Support is given to social benefits (family allowances), and criticism is leveled at the breaking of promises regarding the taxation of pensioners. The speaker opposes any increase in the tax burden.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Economic considerations are tied to ensuring energy security, requiring the government to allocate funds for maintaining oil shale reserves. This points to the necessity of ensuring stable energy production during the transition period through national financial decisions.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Economic concerns are manifesting as opposition to the proposed car tax, which is widely viewed as a measure that will significantly worsen the situation for people living in the countryside, particularly given the complete lack of a functioning public transport system. This clearly indicates a desire to ease the financial burden on residents of rural regions.