By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

The speaker is focusing on the discussion of the State Budget Act and the improvement of parliamentary procedures. He proposes a specific format for the minister's report during the second reading and calls for greater clarity in the overall budget process. The legislative focus is procedural, aimed at streamlining parliamentary operations and increasing transparency.

It focuses on budget and tax legislation, submitting specific draft bills aimed at improving the transparency of the state budget. It proposes the rejection of certain bills and demands amendments to existing laws to mandate that ministries disclose detailed information regarding investments. It stresses the importance of quality and transparency in the legislative process.

The speaker focuses on energy policy issues, particularly the need for dispatchable electricity generation and the organization of public procurements. They raise specific political questions regarding government decisions and request that these topics be addressed at the government level, showing an active interest in shaping energy legislation and policy.

The focus is primarily on the analysis and opposition of budget and tax legislation. It proposes rejecting the amendments to the Income Tax Act during the first reading. It emphasizes the quality of lawmaking, criticizing the drafting of bills where the explanatory memorandum does not correspond to the actual content of the law. It commits to submitting amendments during the committee's work.

The focus is on analyzing and criticizing specific legislative bills, particularly those related to the social sector and administrative reform. It demands more detailed explanations regarding proposed legislative changes and their potential impact. It stresses the significance of budgetary considerations within the legislation, requiring clarity on the sources of funding. It operates primarily as a critical analyst rather than an initiator.

The speaker is focusing on a draft law concerning the expansion of the Health Board's mandate. He/She is demanding legislative amendments that would ensure the mandatory organization of public procurement and the preservation of competition in the provision of healthcare services.