By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

Acknowledges cooperation within the Finance Committee, noting "consensus-based" decision-making and "very good cooperation." Demonstrates a willingness for constructive criticism, praising the committee chairmen and recognizing their work on complex bills. However, they fundamentally remain firm on their own positions.

It is not possible to draw conclusions about the collaboration style based on the limited data.

The speaker emphasizes the strong cooperation within the Finance Committee across party lines, mentioning that "opposition and coalition politicians are quite unified on certain issues." The speaker praises the work of committee chair Annely and shows respect for Regina, an official at the Ministry of Finance. While supporting consensus decisions within the committee, the speaker criticizes the coalition's automatic voting down of proposed amendments.

Demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, referencing previous discussions with the Prime Minister during his tenure as Climate Minister. Offers constructive solutions and expects answers and discussion from the government. The tone is focused more on cooperation than confrontation.

Limited information regarding cooperation. It refers to committee work but emphasizes disagreements rather than collaboration. It mentions the absence of other political parties from the chamber, suggesting minimal direct communication. A willingness to cooperate is not demonstrated; instead, the categorical conditions set by Isamaa for a coalition are highlighted.

The speaker maintains politeness and respect ("esteemed chairman," "dear prime minister"), but shows no signs of readiness to compromise on core issues. They present constructive alternatives, such as offering a cuts plan instead of income tax relief. The willingness to cooperate is limited to polite formalities, but the substance of the position is firm and uncompromising.