Session Profile: Aivar Kokk
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
2024-04-17
Political Position
The speaker fundamentally supports the option of electronic voting but voices strong concerns regarding the system's fairness and equality. They demand stricter limitations on the ability to change e-votes and call for longer verification periods, stressing that the current system fails to guarantee equal treatment for both paper and electronic voters. This stance is reformist yet cautious.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of the technical aspects of electoral systems, mentioning specific elements such as encryption keys, source code publication, and voter applications. They use concrete examples from previous elections (2019) and refer to statistical data concerning the distribution of e-votes versus paper ballots, thereby showing a deep understanding of electoral processes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style is hesitant and inquisitive, characterized by frequent rhetorical questions ("Is this really equal treatment?"). The speaker relies on concrete examples and personal memories, including anecdotes drawn from the Jõgeva pub and a local care home. The tone is moderately critical yet constructive, aiming to find solutions to the issues raised.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
According to the data, the activity is limited to a single speech given during a plenary session on April 17, 2024. The speech was long enough to necessitate a time extension, indicating thorough preparation and a desire to address the subject matter in detail.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker offers moderate criticism of the current draft election bill, but avoids personally attacking anyone. They express concern about the potential for system abuse, citing specific instances of suspicious voting that occurred in nursing homes and pubs. The criticism is systemic, not personal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker respectfully addresses his colleagues ("Dear colleagues!") and puts forward constructive proposals for improving the system. He is not ruling out collaboration; rather, he seeks additions and amendments to the existing draft, demonstrating an openness to compromise.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker specifically mentions Jõgeva and Viljandi, drawing examples from local situations. They reference the Jõgeva pub and local election experiences, which indicates an awareness of the specific characteristics and issues faced by smaller localities when organizing elections.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is insufficient data regarding the economic positions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker expresses concern about the potential exploitation of elderly people in care homes and the influencing of young people at entertainment events. He emphasizes the need to protect vulnerable voter groups, which indicates a commitment to social responsibility and a sense of justice.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker focuses on the Act amending the Riigikogu Election Act, analyzing in detail the mandates of the Republic's Electoral Committee and the technical aspects of electronic voting. He/She makes specific proposals for supplementing the Act, including restrictions on changing e-votes and the extension of control periods.
2 Speeches Analyzed