Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk
Second Reading of the Draft Act (344 SE) on the Amendment of the Riigikogu Election Act and Related Amendment of Other Acts
2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker supports the option of electronic voting in principle, but expresses strong concern regarding the fairness and equality of the system. They demand stricter limitations on the ability to change e-votes and longer verification periods, emphasizing that the current system does not guarantee equal treatment between paper ballots and e-votes. The position is reform-oriented but cautious, calling for additional safeguards.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the technical side of electoral systems, mentioning specific elements such as encryption keys, source code publication, and voter applications. He/She uses concrete examples from past elections (2019) and statistical data concerning the distribution of e-votes, showing an in-depth understanding of the practical aspects of electoral processes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of delivery is narrative and personal, incorporating concrete examples and anecdotes (Sinu Pubi, the nursing home incident). The tone is moderately critical yet constructive, balancing emotional appeals with logical arguments. The speaker employs rhetorical questions and repetition to underscore their viewpoints, all while maintaining politeness and collegiality.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker offers moderate criticism of the approach taken by the National Electoral Committee and the State Electoral Service, expressing concern over overly lax control mechanisms. The criticism is primarily procedural and systemic, rather than personal, focusing on the potential for politicians to manipulate elections and gain an unfair advantage through e-voting.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker addresses colleagues respectfully ("Dear colleagues!") and employs inclusive language ("our task"), demonstrating an openness to collaboration. He expresses the wish to improve the system rather than dismantle it, which signals a readiness for compromise and a constructive approach.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker mentions specific Estonian cities/towns, such as Viljandi and Jõgeva, using them as examples of potential election manipulation. This demonstrates an awareness of local-level issues and a concern for the electoral processes in smaller communities.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is focusing on amendments to the Riigikogu Election Act, demanding additional safeguards within the e-voting system. They support the main thrust of the law but desire stricter limitations on the possibility of changing votes and a longer verification period. The approach is constructive, not obstructive, focusing on perfecting the legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed