Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk
Third reading of the draft law on the state's supplementary budget for 2025 (651 SE)
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker clearly adopts a left-wing economic policy position, strongly criticizing the income tax exemption granted to high earners at the expense of pensioners. He consistently emphasizes the need for public spending cuts and maintains an oppositional stance regarding the coalition's tax increases. The position is very strong, utilizing sharp phrases like "embarrassing budget" and accusing the Reform Party of damaging the economy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of state budget and tax policy, providing specific figures and calculations. Precisely details the losses incurred by pensioners (17 million in 2025, 76 million in 2027) and the timeline for tax increases. Exhibits strong familiarity with the content of coalition agreements and the budgetary processes of various ministries.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs highly aggressive and confrontational rhetoric, blending emotional expressions ("embarrassing," "bluff") with specific numerical arguments. The rhetoric is distinctly accusatory and polarizing, repeatedly using contrast ("high-wage earners vs. pensioners"). The style is direct and uncompromising.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Based on the calls, it is impossible to establish any regular patterns of occurrence or a consistent rhythm of activity. There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponent is the Reform Party, which is accused of damaging the economy and making false promises. It also criticizes the ministers from Eesti 200 for a lack of transparency. The opposition is categorical and uncompromising, stating that the supplementary budget "cannot be supported under any circumstances." The attacks are both political and personal.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There are no signs of willingness to cooperate—on the contrary, the speaker clearly adopts a confrontational stance. While they do mention the successful past cooperation of Isamaa, Keskerakond, and EKRE, they show no possibilities for collaboration with the current coalition. The style is isolating rather than cooperation-oriented.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The town of Tapa is specifically mentioned as an example of regional clientelism, accusing one minister of striking a deal with their own constituency. No other regional focus is evident in the speeches—the emphasis remains strictly at the national level.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
They clearly advocate for fiscal discipline and reduced government spending, while opposing tax hikes. They strongly criticize progressive tax policies, particularly the income tax relief provided to high earners. They argue that economic growth is achieved through cutting, not increasing, expenditures. They tend to favor a conservative fiscal policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It focuses primarily on protecting pensioners, highlighting their rights and interests. It employs intergenerational rhetoric, such as ("from the pockets of our parents and grandparents"). There is insufficient data available regarding other social issues.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on opposing the supplementary budget bill, demanding greater transparency from ministries throughout the budget process. It emphasizes the necessity of adhering to the cost-saving commitments outlined in the coalition agreement. The legislative focus is clearly centered on fiscal and tax policy.
3 Speeches Analyzed