Agenda Profile: Aivar Kokk
Third reading of the draft law on the security tax (512 SE)
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker adopts a strongly opposing stance regarding the security tax law, arguing that it is an "omnibus tax" that does not actually go toward security. He emphasizes that the tax harms the most vulnerable groups: pensioners and families with many children. He accuses the government of spreading lies and concealing tax hikes behind the rhetoric of defense spending.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the state budget structure, citing specific figures regarding the growth of the Ministry of Defence budget (56 million, 227 million, 7 million) and tax revenues (over 700 million annually). It refers to specific data concerning the tax burden on pensioners (17 million, 76 million euros) and defense procurements, including the cost of long-range missiles.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Uses emotionally charged and accusatory rhetoric, calling the law a "deceitful bill" and a "tax on fleecing the poorest." It relies heavily on numerical arguments, but presents them in a dramatic fashion. It concludes with a party slogan emphasizing the necessity of Isamaa coming to power.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The individual is limited to two speeches per day within the framework of the third reading of the Security Tax Act. He/She is requesting additional speaking time to conclude their argumentation, which demonstrates thorough preparation and a desire to present arguments in detail.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Directs sharp criticism at the Reform Party and the coalition, accusing them of spreading lies and favoring high earners. He directly named the former prime minister for the 2 billion 'taken out of the pocket.' He rules out any possibility of compromise, declaring the categorical opposition of the Isamaa faction.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It shows no signs of willingness to cooperate; on the contrary, it challenges coalition politicians to prove their claims, adding skeptically, "one still has a chance." It emphasizes the faction's unity in opposing the draft bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It focuses on national issues, without mentioning specific regions or local problems. It references Estonia's position in the European context concerning the high cost of food (second only to Denmark).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The statement expresses strong opposition to tax increases, particularly the raising of income tax and VAT. It criticizes the preferential treatment given to high-earners at the expense of low- and middle-income individuals. Furthermore, it emphasizes the issue of the economic downturn and the necessity for economic growth, rather than the introduction of new taxes.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Focuses on the protection of socially vulnerable groups—pensioners and large families. It particularly highlights the hardships faced by elderly people living alone and low-income families. It does not address traditional social issues such as LGBTQ+ rights or immigration.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the detailed analysis and opposition to the security tax law. It criticizes the use of omnibus bills, referencing the spring promise not to submit them. It demands transparency regarding decisions related to defense procurements and honest explanations about the actual use of the funds.
2 Speeches Analyzed