By Plenary Sessions: Mait Klaassen

The style is formal and respectful, starting by commending the minister's enthusiasm. The speaker leverages their academic background (a doctoral degree) to establish credibility when handling complex topics. The focus is on logical and political argumentation, raising questions about the imposition of legislative restrictions.

The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and highly detailed, serving the objective of presenting a summary of the committee meeting. The tone is neutral and informative, focusing on the logical and fact-based conveyance of information (questions, answers, procedural decisions). Emotional appeals are not employed; instead, emphasis is placed on the technical content and procedural course of the draft legislation.

The address is formal and respectful, directed toward the Director and the Chancellor of Justice, and includes thanks for the presentation. The style is argumentative and centers on legal logic, bringing forward a specific example of the Police and Border Guard Board’s (PPA) activities to underscore the infringement upon the inviolability of the home.

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, typical of a presentation given by a representative of the steering committee. The speaker focuses on the precise and logical conveyance of facts, the substance of the committee's deliberations, and procedural decisions. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on details and the question-and-answer structure.