By Agendas: Toomas Kivimägi

The confrontation is aimed at "opponents," who are criticized for either forgetting or failing to account for the effect that increased defense spending has on the size of the budget deficit. The criticism is both policy- and fact-based, accusing the adversaries of presenting an incomplete picture.

There is not enough data.

Criticism is aimed at both state institutions and private companies that require the selection of the Estonian language by pressing a key in order to receive a service. The opposition is strong and focuses on procedural constitutionality, rather than on the specific institutions named.

The speaker expresses neither criticism nor opposition, addressing members of the government respectfully. There is insufficient data.

The opposition is directed at colleagues (specifically Urmas Reinsalu) and parliamentary groups who challenge the board’s decisions or violate established parliamentary practices. The criticism is procedural, accusing them of wasting time and attempting to create unnecessary concern regarding the Prime Minister’s availability. He/She warns factions that are unwilling to maintain the custom regarding the positions of committee chairmen.

The criticism is directed at the shortcomings of the current legal order, especially the provisions regulating statutes of limitation, which allow individuals to evade conviction. Indirectly, the influence of the media is also criticized, as it tends to find people guilty from the very moment criminal proceedings are initiated.

Insufficient data

The opposition is directed at a large, but unnamed group of Riigikogu members who sought to implement a Santa Claus tax. The criticism is political (anti-tax), and the speaker emphasizes the successful counteraction against this internal opposition. Names are not being disclosed due to data protection restrictions.

Insufficient information

Direct opponents are not named, but indirect criticism is leveled at the direction of the government's fiscal policy, questioning the priority given to finding additional taxes over cutting costs. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the choices made in managing the state budget.

Insufficient information.

Insufficient data. There is a complete lack of any criticism towards opponents, policy, or procedures.