By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The speaker’s rhetorical style is formal, appreciative, and optimistic, emphasizing the bill’s positive impact on local governance. He/She employs logical and procedural arguments to justify the necessity of reducing bureaucracy and increasing flexibility. The tone is constructive, referencing the need for improvisation that arose during the coronavirus epidemic, which will now be addressed through a clear legal framework.

The address is highly formal, objective, and procedural, focusing on the detailed reporting of the Constitutional Committee's deliberations and decisions. The style is logical and descriptive, avoiding emotional assessments and referencing the positions held by colleagues and representatives of the Chancellery. The overall tone is explanatory and informative, fitting for a report delivered by the chairman of the lead committee.

The speaker adopts an analytical and questioning style, conveying confusion and a need for supporting arguments. The tone is formal and logical, centered on the observation that the committee discussions failed to provide sufficient justification for easing the language requirements.