By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The style is predominantly formal and procedural, focusing on the transmission of committee meeting minutes and responding to inquiries. However, when presenting on behalf of Eesti 200, the tone shifts to urgent and highly persuasive, employing security-based arguments and concrete examples of the Moscow Patriarchate's support for military activity.

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing the Chancellor of Justice with heartfelt thanks and praise for a substantive presentation. The speaker poses a broad, philosophical question regarding the balance between freedom and responsibility, employing a logical line of reasoning. He begins with a brief procedural remark, demonstrating attention to the order of the session.

The rhetorical style when addressing legislative topics is formal and businesslike, focusing on logical argumentation (resolving inconsistencies). However, one earlier address included a humorous and personal note, referencing a lost apple and the vitamin deficiency of deskmate Juku-Kalle Raid. The overall tone during the presentation of the draft law is moderately persuasive and explanatory.