By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The rhetorical style is initially formal and value-driven, quickly shifting to passionate and sharply condemnatory when criticizing the events in Georgia and the domestic opposition. The speaker employs both emotional appeals (sympathy, sadness, disgust) and logical argumentation, drawing upon the constitution, personal experience, and international reports. The speaker warns that discussing certain topics might necessitate the use of unprintable language.

The tone is supportive and optimistic about the draft bill, but includes slight criticism directed at the previous speaker, who is accused of going off-topic and wasting time. The speaker is direct and promises not to take up much time, focusing on rational arguments concerning flexibility and efficiency.