By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

Criticism is aimed at the planners of the public transport reform, who stand accused of blindly implementing a foreign model while completely disregarding the existing system. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedure, stressing that the reform is based solely on the experience of the poorly functioning public transport in Tallinn and Harju County, rather than a wider regional analysis. The exclusion of passenger satisfaction from the reform's objectives is viewed as an alarming mistake.

No data available

The criticism is aimed at the shortcomings of the government's (or the minister's) presentation, as cybersecurity was not treated as a sufficiently serious problem. This constitutes a policy-based opposition, calling for additional attention and funding in a specific area, rather than being a personal attack.

The criticism is directed at international restrictions and the governments of allied nations (producing countries) who may impose limitations on the use of weapons. No direct opposition to the Estonian government's policy is voiced; instead, an uncomfortable strategic risk scenario is presented.