Session Profile: Ando Kiviberg
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-11-11
Political Position
The political stance strongly emphasizes the principles of the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary, while criticizing ideological pressure being placed on the Supreme Court nominee. The speaker supports draft legislation that they deem to be pro-Estonian and patriotic, demonstrating a value-based approach to lawmaking. They stress that judgments must be rendered primarily based on the letter and the spirit of the law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of lawmaking and the judicial system, particularly regarding the procedures for selecting candidates for the Supreme Court and the work of the Constitutional Committee. He/She demonstrates an understanding of the necessity of distinguishing between law and political ideology in adjudication. Furthermore, he/she is familiar with the need for inter-factional coordination when handling draft legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is substantive, formal, and procedural, utilizing polite forms of address ("esteemed chairman"). The speaker presents their views logically, emphasizing procedural correctness and directing principled criticism toward ideological pressure. The tone is analytical rather than emotional.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the plenary sessions of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) as a questioner and has participated in the work of the Constitutional Committee. He/She highlights his/her activity in questioning candidates, noting that he/she was the only person to question the Supreme Court candidate before the committee. This points to detailed and procedural engagement.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The confrontation is aimed at a specific group, identified as being "from the far right side of the hall," who are being criticized for imposing ideological viewpoints on the Supreme Court nominee. The criticism is fundamental, pointing to the opponents' potential ignorance regarding the core principles of administering justice (adherence to the law).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates significant interest in inter-factional cooperation, specifically inquiring about coordinating the bill proposed by Isamaa with either the Center Party faction or its board. He/She cites a successful negotiation experience in Tallinn as an example, which suggests an openness toward forming coalitions and reaching compromises.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is indirect, referring to the local elections and the successful outcome of the Tallinn negotiations, using this as an example of the cooperation potential between the Centre Party (Keskerakond) and Isamaa. However, the main focus remains at the national level (Riigikogu, Riigikohus).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is centered on ensuring the integrity of the judicial system and upholding the principles of the Rule of Law during the confirmation process for candidates to the Supreme Court. Furthermore, concerning draft legislation, emphasis is placed on the significance of political objectives (a pro-Estonian stance) and coordination between parliamentary factions. He/She takes on a supportive role when the draft legislation aims for a pro-Estonian outcome.
2 Speeches Analyzed