Agenda Profile: Ando Kiviberg
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – Third Reading
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports amending the constitution via a fast-track procedure (Bill 536 SE), viewing it as a decisive step in liberating Estonia from the colonial legacy of the Soviet occupation. This political position is value-driven, emphasizing resolve and determination in defending Estonia’s most cherished values against the covert influence of the Russian Federation. The primary focus is on ensuring security and mitigating the threats posed by hybrid warfare.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of security policy and history, analyzing the collective condition of Russian society and the hybrid warfare efforts of the Kremlin regime. Particular emphasis is placed on the impact of the legacy of the Soviet occupation and Great Russian chauvinism on Estonia’s internal security. Historical references and sociological terminology (e.g., "moral compass," "mass manipulation") are utilized.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The language used is formal, yet deeply emotional and urgent, employing strong moral and historical appeals (referencing August 20, 1991). The style is decisive and patriotic, describing the Russian threat using aggressive metaphors ("the scoundrel has the taste of blood in its mouth"). Simultaneously, colleagues are addressed with gratitude and exhortation, emphasizing the necessity of unity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speech was delivered in the Riigikogu during the third reading of the bill to amend the Constitution, which demonstrates active participation in critical legislative processes. The speaker represents the Estonia 200 faction and requests additional time at the conclusion of their address.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary confrontation is aimed at the Putin regime and the majority of Russian society, who are described as being obsessed with the idea of restoring a colonial empire and morally bankrupt. The criticism also concerns those residents of Estonia who support the Great Russian chauvinistic worldview and are thus a threat to the security of the Estonian state. Any compromise regarding the appeasement of external threats is ruled out.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker stresses the necessity of an exceptionally broad consensus for amending the constitution through an expedited procedure, and thanks colleagues from the majority of parties represented in the Riigikogu for putting their disagreements aside. The tone is one of collaboration, urging those who are hesitant to join the supporters in a demonstration of solidarity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly at the national level (strengthening Estonian independence and national identity) and international, concentrating on the aggression of the Russian Federation and Ukraine's war for freedom. There are no references to specific local regions or electoral districts.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Social issues concerning the legacy of the Russian Empire and the chauvinistic attitudes prevalent among people residing in Estonia are addressed. Emphasis is placed on the need to abandon complacency and protect the unique values of Estonian culture, contrasting this with the rights of colonialists. The topic is framed through the protection of security and national identity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is the third reading of the draft Act on Amendments to the Constitution (Bill 536 SE), which aims to reduce the Russian Federation's covert influence in Estonia. The speaker is a strong supporter and advocate for this fast-tracked bill, considering it a historically significant decision.
2 Speeches Analyzed