Agenda Profile: Ando Kiviberg
Continuation of the first reading of the Draft Act (682 SE) on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Prison Sentences of the Kingdom of Sweden in the Republic of Estonia
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political position is strongly supportive of the agreement between Estonia and Sweden regarding the enforcement of prison sentences, highlighting its ingenuity, security, and economic advantage. The speaker is inherently optimistic and solution-oriented, presenting the draft legislation as an example of effective governance in addressing the issue of underutilized prisons. The stance is firmly results- and policy-driven, contrasting sharply with the opposition's alleged irrationality and fear-mongering.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in prison administration, crime statistics, and the specific construction requirements for detention facilities, referencing the decreasing prison population and the costly nature of the concrete colossus. He emphasizes that the solution is secure and has been meticulously planned. The source of this information is cited as personal communication with relevant experts and officials.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is initially optimistic and solution-focused, but it turns sharp and moralizing when criticizing the opposition. Strong emotional appeals are employed, accusing opponents of jealousy and cynical scare tactics. The speaker uses simple analogies (such as the farmer) and appeals to rationality, while simultaneously attempting to demonize the opponents’ motives (labeling them outright lies and repulsive).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active in the debate, requesting additional time and referencing the comprehensive discussion held yesterday and today. They are speaking on behalf of the faction, which points to coordinated action. Personal communication with relevant experts and officials prior to the vote is also mentioned.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is being criticized intensely and personally, accused of political jealousy, irrational behavior, and cynical calculation aimed at boosting political support. The criticism is directed at their methods—the use of half-truths or outright lies, and the sowing of baseless panic and fear. The speaker considers the opposition's activities to be bothersome and mere stalling that causes financial harm to the state.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker is strongly intra-factional and pro-coalition, calling on all good colleagues, on behalf of the Eesti 200 parliamentary group, to vote in favor of the agreement. He emphasizes that finding the solution is "an achievement for all of us." There is no willingness to cooperate with the opposition, as their actions are considered irrational obstructionism, for which they should actually be grateful.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the national and international level, addressing the agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden. Specifically mentioned is the expensively constructed prison facility complex located in Tartu, for which a new application is currently being sought.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Supports the economically sound use of state assets and revenue generation, emphasizing that renting out prison spaces is beneficial, even profitable, for the Estonian citizen. This approach is fiscally responsible, as the alternative would be the demolition of a costly building or the accumulation of financial loss due to delays. The service is offered to a wealthy neighboring country under terms and conditions set by Estonia.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The focus is on social security, confirming that the plan for accepting foreign prisoners has been carefully considered and poses no threat to Estonian society. It acknowledges that prisons and prisoners are not a pleasant subject, but emphasizes that crime rates in Estonia have actually been falling. It sharply criticizes the opposition for fear-mongering on social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative priority is supporting the draft legislation (Bill 682 SE) concerning the ratification of the agreement between Estonia and Sweden on the enforcement of custodial sentences. The speaker is a staunch proponent and the spokesperson for the parliamentary group. Furthermore, he referenced an earlier bill aimed at holding members of the government accountable for misrepresentation, and he supports extending this liability to include members of the Riigikogu (Parliament) as well.
2 Speeches Analyzed