Agenda Profile: Ando Kiviberg
Draft law amending the Prison Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (474 SE) - first reading
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The political focus is on amendments to the Imprisonment Act, particularly the expansion of background checks and the transparency surrounding the processing of personal data. The speaker stresses the necessity of moving forward incrementally in the legislative process and questions whether the proposed security measures are sufficiently stringent, noting a bias toward security. It is crucial to strike a balance between security measures and fundamental rights, especially the protection of family life.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of the amendments to the Imprisonment Act, regulations concerning the processing of personal data, and the procedural rules of the Legal Affairs Committee. They are able to convey in detail the explanations provided by the Ministry of Justice and the Minister regarding the principles of drafting legislation, such as the philosophy of avoiding "mammoth bills." Furthermore, they are familiar with the practical aspects of prison security, such as the challenges associated with introducing prohibited items.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speech is highly formal, procedural, and objective, typical of a commission rapporteur's style. The style is analytical and descriptive, focusing on the detailed reporting of the Legal Affairs Committee discussion and the communication of consensus decisions. The arguments are purely logical and fact-based, citing specific questions and the ministry's responses.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participated in the Legal Affairs Committee session on September 16, where they posed clarifying questions concerning the selectivity and rigor of the background check. On September 25, having been designated as the representative of the lead committee, they presented the committee's report to the Riigikogu plenary assembly.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrated a strong spirit of cooperation, stressing that all procedural decisions of the Legal Affairs Committee (such as placing the draft bill on the agenda, concluding the first reading, and setting a deadline) were reached by consensus. He conveyed the substance of the cross-party debate, highlighting the questions and viewpoints raised by various colleagues (e.g., Toomast, Kovalenko-Kõlvart, Hanimägi).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national legislation (the Imprisonment Act) and its implementation in Estonia. A speculative international aspect is also mentioned regarding the idea of renting out prison spaces, but there is no focus on specific Estonian regions or local issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A crucial social topic in the context of the Imprisonment Act is guaranteeing security (background checks) alongside fundamental rights, especially the protection of family life. It is stressed that the prison service must prioritize ensuring the protection of family life, even if a close relative has been under police scrutiny.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the Draft Act amending the Imprisonment Act and other legislation (474 SE), which aims to broaden background checks and ensure legal certainty regarding the processing of personal data. As a representative of the lead committee, the speaker supports and drives the bill's proceedings, proposing to conclude the first reading and establish a deadline for submitting amendments.
2 Speeches Analyzed