By Plenary Sessions: Signe Kivi

The style is formal, explanatory, and procedure-focused, concentrating on detailing the history of the draft legislation and the background of the ensuing debates. The speaker employs logical argumentation, directly citing the Auditor General to confirm the legal competence of the chosen solution. The tone is balanced and purposeful, avoiding emotional appeals.

The style is formal and analytical, focusing on procedural clarity and substantive control. The speaker poses a direct and challenging question to verify whether the draft bill under consideration contains new information, relying on logical argumentation and previous official reviews.

The style is formal and respectful, but it includes a personal testimony and an emotional appeal (a reference to an appeal made to women 30 years ago). The speaker starts by defending the faction concerning their worries about the birth rate, before moving on to posing a constructive question.

The style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the Auditor General and the manager. The speaker employs logical and analytical argumentation, presenting a rhetorical question which simultaneously serves as a justification for their previous actions. The tone is measured and defensive.

The rhetoric is formal and respectful, addressing the Chairman and the Minister directly. The style is analytical and data-driven, utilizing statistics on education spending to support the arguments. The speech concludes with a direct political question posed to the Minister, maintaining a neutral and investigative tone.