Session Profile: Signe Kivi

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

2024-01-16

Political Position
The political focus centers on the handling of symbols and monuments of the Soviet occupation, particularly in light of Putin’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the celebration of which is met with complete consensus in opposition. However, caution is expressed regarding disturbing or moving the specific Bronze Soldier statue in its current location, raising the question of whether the time for provocations has truly passed. This stance is value-based, emphasizing firm opposition to the glorification of the occupation.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the context surrounding Soviet-era monuments and artworks, referencing the previous relocation of the Bronze Soldier and the example of the ceiling painting in the Estonia Theatre. They use specific terminology such as "sculpture group" and address the presenter as a historian, seeking serious historical arguments. They also attempt to broaden the discussion beyond sculptures to include other artworks that glorify Soviet power.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is polite, formal, and inquisitive. The speaker apologizes for not having fully listened to the preceding discussion and thanks the presenter for the comprehensive overview. The style is logical and cautious, focusing on clarifying the scope of the draft bill and the historical arguments, while carefully avoiding emotional appeals.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is participating in the plenary session, posing questions regarding the draft bill. He/She notes that they were unable to hear the previous answers from their room, which indicates active engagement during the session.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed at the glorification of Soviet power and occupation, and its association with Putin's war of aggression against Ukraine. The criticism is directed at ideological symbols and their current use, rather than specific political opponents.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The collaborative style is open and inquisitive, seeking clarification from the rapporteur regarding the scope of the committee's discussions. Agreement has been reached on the principal clause of the explanatory memorandum, which indicates a readiness to recognize a common value base.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on national issues concerning historical memory and symbols of occupation, as well as the international context (Russia's aggression against Ukraine). Specific regional topics are lacking.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue is historical memory and national identity, which are linked to the symbols of the Soviet occupation. Emphasis is placed on the need to address artworks that glorify the Soviet regime and occupation, and to avoid provocations.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently centered on deliberating a specific draft bill concerning the fate of Soviet-era sculptures and artworks. The speaker is acting as a questioner, seeking to broaden the bill's scope (for instance, to include ceiling paintings) and understand its underlying rationale.

2 Speeches Analyzed