By Agendas: Signe Kivi

Total Agendas: 33

Fully Profiled: 33

2025-10-07
First Reading of the 2026 State Budget Bill (737 SE)

The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting

The language used is formal and respectful, addressing the Minister directly. The style is logical and question-oriented, while simultaneously using an acknowledgment of the Minister's personal passion ("Knowing your passion for the Estonian language") as an introduction to the argument. The tone is businesslike and demands a clear answer regarding the government's deliberations.
2025-09-17
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA) Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.

The rhetorical style is formal and procedural, focusing on the logical framing of the issue and demanding accountability from both the presenter and the commission. The speaker uses direct quotation of the president's letter to establish authority and refers to the president's stance as a "reproach" rather than a proposal, thereby emphasizing the seriousness of the criticism.
2025-06-18
Draft law amending the Basic Education and Upper Secondary Education Act and the Vocational Education Institutions Act (director certification and teacher career model) (653 SE) - first reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The style is formal and interrogative, addressing the minister and director directly. The speaker employs a logical appeal, relying on specific data (4,210 teachers) and the written concerns expressed by authoritative organizations (e.g., the Teachers' Union, the Association of Cities and Municipalities). The tone is neutral and informative, acting as a mediator of external concern.
2025-04-22
The Minister of Culture's 2025 presentation on the implementation of the state's long-term development strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of "The Fundamentals of Estonian Sports Policy until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is direct, demanding, and critical, starting with the phrase, "I ask directly." The tone is concerned and accusatory, emphasizing procedural failures and the oddity of the minister's actions ("strangely enough"). The appeal is primarily logical and fact-based, demanding explanations regarding the inaction.
2025-04-21
First reading of the draft resolution "Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to examine the security of the Riigikogu e-election process" (576 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The speaker's style is formal and critical, emphasizing procedural logic and deficiencies in credibility. Direct questions and allusions are used to challenge the qualifications of the experts underpinning the draft bill, demanding specific data.
2025-02-25
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – second reading

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, focusing on security risks and political ramifications. The speaker cites data and poses direct questions to underscore the seriousness and urgency of the topic ("How serious is this problem, actually?"). Simultaneously, a polite and appreciative tone is maintained toward the presenter ("Kudos for a very thorough presentation!").
2024-11-21
Discussion of the nationally significant issue initiated by the Environment Committee: "The Impact of Climate Change on Estonia's Legal Framework and Economy."

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal and question-oriented, respectfully addressing the rapporteur. Both procedural criticism (checking the faction's participation) and logical opposition are employed to highlight the contradiction between climate objectives and commercial reality ("buy three and get one free").
2024-11-20
Draft law amending the Constitution of the Republic of Estonia (536 SE) – first reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The style of address is formal and respectful, directed toward the esteemed Chairman and the Rapporteur. The tone is measured and analytical, emphasizing the historical value of the Constitution and raising a specific procedural question regarding the most problematic aspect of the ongoing amendment.
2024-11-12
Second reading of the bill (457 SE) amending the Act on the Government of the Republic and amending other acts in connection therewith (restructuring the State Real Estate Enterprise into the State Real Estate and Cadastre Enterprise)

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal, polite, and interrogative, respectfully addressing both the chairperson and the presenter. The speaker employs logical argumentation, drawing upon previous examples of administrative reform to highlight the complexity of the current task. Fact-based and procedural questions are preferred over emotional appeals.
2024-11-11
Draft law amending the Act on Termination of Pregnancy and Sterilisation (459 SE) - First Reading

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session

The style is formal and respectful, using the addresses "esteemed chairman" and "respected presenter." The tone is serious and analytical, posing questions that challenge the breadth of the bill's focus in order to address the problem more comprehensively.
2024-11-07
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)

15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is polite, formal, and constructive, starting by thanking the presenter for raising the topic. Logical and institutional argumentation is used, focusing on emphasizing the potential of existing structures (BA).
2024-11-06
Overview of the Use and Preservation of State Property in 2023–2024. Five Years of Activity-Based State Budget: Results of the Reform and Necessary Further Decisions

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing both the Chairman and the presenter with respect. He uses his previous ministerial experience (2000) to establish credibility, and then poses specific, procedural questions regarding the format of the budget presentation.
2024-10-10
Draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE) – second reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.

The rhetorical style is serious and concerned, employing an emotional appeal and referencing a previous shocking incident to highlight deficiencies in the law. The speaker addresses the presenter in a formal atmosphere, posing direct and critical questions regarding both substantive and procedural aspects.
2024-10-09
Draft resolution "Establishment of a working group to address the population crisis" (324 OE) – first reading

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.

The rhetorical style is formal and analytical, leaning heavily on academic citations to substantiate the arguments. The tone is interrogative and critical, casting doubt on the effectiveness of the proposed solution (the commission) as well as the opposing side's rhetoric. It employs both logical argumentation and an emotional defense against accusations of insulting the women of its own faction.
2024-09-18
First reading of the Riigikogu Resolution "Recall of a Member of the National Opera Council who is a Member of the Riigikogu and Appointment of a New Member" (Draft Resolution 494)

15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session

The speech is formal, substantive, and procedural, focusing on presenting the text of the draft bill and the background surrounding its adoption. The tone is neutral and objective, relying on logical appeal and avoiding emotional expressions.
2024-09-10
First reading of the Draft Act on the Amendment of Section 2 of the Law on Holidays and Commemorative Dates (402 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is courteous and formal, utilizing the addresses "Esteemed Chairman" and "Respected Rapporteur." The address is brief, direct, and focuses purely on requesting factual information regarding the content of the draft legislation.
2024-06-13
Bank of Estonia 2023 Report

Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session

The language used is formal and respectful ("esteemed chairman," "respected president"). The style is direct and focused on questions, emphasizing consistency with previous appearances. A logical and relevant method of questioning is employed.
2024-05-14
First Reading of the Draft Act Amending the Language Act and the Public Transport Act (Bill 397 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The style he employs is formal and informative, given that he is presenting the commission's protocol, but it also includes personal and persuasive elements, such as a personal example of the "burden" associated with speaking Russian. He adopts a tone of concern, describing the language situation in the public sphere as "dismal," and uses a logical appeal, warning against the risk of provincialization. Kivi emphasizes the necessity of a societal agreement concerning the responsibility for language instruction.
2024-05-07
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (410 OE) of the Riigikogu titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Find a Solution for the Construction of an Extension to the National Opera Estonia"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal and persuasive, utilizing extensive historical quotes (Hugo Peets, Rudolf Tobias) and parallels (e.g., the 1938 elections versus recent events in Tallinn) to establish legitimacy. The speech balances logical arguments (financial capability, technical requirements) and emotional arguments (the soul of the national opera). It concludes with an invoking and patriotic tone ("Long live Estonia! Long live Estonia!").
2024-05-06
A written motion submitted by 22 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Education and Research, Kristina Kallas

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.

The discourse is formal and respectful, beginning with a direct acknowledgment of the minister ("I wish to commend you"). The style is rather conciliatory and analytical, focusing on assessing the effectiveness of the minister's work. It concludes with a direct and specific question concerning the two extremes (success and failure).
2024-04-16
The Minister of Culture's 2024 Report on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Estonia 2035" (including the implementation of the "Estonian Sports Policy Fundamentals until 2030")

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is polite, formal, and respectful, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the minister and the chairperson. The tone is analytical and focuses on the political question, seeking clarity regarding the ministry's support mechanisms and priorities.
2024-04-10
First reading of the Draft Resolution (365 OE) of the Riigikogu concerning the resolution titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Eliminate the Russian-Language Versions of the Websites of Ministries and Other Government Agencies."

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is predominantly formal and informative, especially concerning Signe Kivi, who presents a detailed and neutral commission report. Kivi uses numerous references and cites both colleagues and experts, focusing on a logical and fact-based appeal. The first speaker employs an inquisitive and constructive tone, seeking a more flexible legislative solution that would serve the common ultimate goal.
2024-03-20
Third Reading of the Draft Act (338 SE) on Amendments to the Estonian Cultural Endowment Act and the Gambling Tax Act

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is formal, explanatory, and measured, focusing on justifying the content of the bill and the procedural correctness of its adoption. Logical arguments are employed, and reference is made to previous parliamentary debates and the positions of the State Comptroller. The tone is conciliatory, acknowledging prior disputes and disagreements, but defending the chosen solution as legally sound.
2024-03-19
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Improving Teachers' Working Conditions" (373 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is formal, analytical, and interrogative. The speaker employs a logical appeal, presenting a direct question to compel the rapporteur to justify the specific added value of the draft proposal or the deficiencies within the government's plan.
2024-03-13
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic for Increasing the Birth Rate of the Estonian People" (283 OE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.

The style is initially defensive and personal, refuting criticism about the Reform Party's supposed lack of concern. A strong emotional appeal and a personal historical narrative (specifically, the protest in Town Hall Square) are employed to demonstrate commitment. The conclusion is questioning and solution-oriented.
2024-03-11
Question Regarding the Financing of Cultural Buildings of National Significance (No. 600)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is formal and respectful (addressing the esteemed Chairman and the Auditor General), and purely interrogative in nature. Complex, conditional language is employed ("If we had chosen... we would have had to open..."), suggesting a cautious and analytical tone aimed at seeking confirmation regarding the correctness of the decision that was made.
2024-03-05
2024 Report by the Minister of Education and Research on the Implementation of the State's Long-Term Development Strategy "Eesti 2035" (Education Reforms)

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing the Minister with deference and posing a question. The appeal is primarily logical, relying on statistical data and historical facts to justify the necessity of reform.
2024-02-21
Second Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Estonian Cultural Endowment Act and the Gambling Tax Act (338 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The speech is formal, explanatory, and informative, focusing on a detailed description of the bill's content and the preparation process. The emphasis is placed on logical argumentation, justifying the changes by citing growth in tax revenues and long-term cultural policy requirements. The tone is moderate and geared toward consensus, avoiding emotional appeals.
2024-02-14
First Reading of the Motor Vehicle Tax Bill (364 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session

The rhetorical style is formal and concerned, relying on logical arguments and expressing worry on behalf of the stakeholders (museum directors, owners). The speaker uses citation to emphasize the seriousness of the problem and establish credibility. The question is posed directly to the minister, demanding a specific answer regarding both the ministry's proposal and the content of the letter.
2024-02-13
Debate on Foreign Policy as an Issue of Significant National Importance, initiated by the Foreign Affairs Committee

15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session

The style is formal and respectful, directly addressing the minister ("Esteemed Minister!"). The presentation is built upon logical arguments and concrete data to justify the necessity of a national contribution. The tone is inquiring and informative, rather than emotional.
2024-02-07
First reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Higher Education Act (291 SE)

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.

The style is formal and interrogative, utilizing polite forms of address ("Esteemed Chairman! Respected Presenter!"). Emphasis is placed on the logical and procedural framing of the question, the goal of which is to gain clarity regarding the speed of the changes and the previous procedural history of the draft bill.
2024-01-23
Overview of the state of Research and Development and government policy in this field.

15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session

The rhetorical style is polite, formal, and constructive, beginning with thanks to both the presiding officer and the Prime Minister for the comprehensive report. The questions are specific and aimed at obtaining political information, avoiding emotional or aggressive appeals.
2024-01-16
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu (104 OE), titled "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic to Remove the So-Called Bronze Soldier Statue from Public Space"

15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting

The rhetorical style is polite, formal, and inquisitive, addressing the chair and the rapporteur with respect. The speaker presents their reservations cautiously, seeking specific and substantive arguments, and balancing personal opinion with factual evidence. An analytical approach is employed, broadening the discussion from the specific wording of the draft proposal to other similar works of art.