By Plenary Sessions: Meelis Kiili

The style is formal, detailed, and procedural, characteristic of a steering committee report. Although the intensity of the process is mentioned, emphasis is placed on the quality and consensus of the final outcome, utilizing logical and systematic argumentation. The final assessment is optimistic, noting that a "near-ideal" result was achieved thanks to systematic work.

The style is formal, respectful, and conceptual, employing strategic terminology and politely addressing both the chairperson and the presenter. The speaker relies on logical arguments, highlighting the crucial distinction between strategy and tactics. The address concludes with an impactful, authoritative paraphrase of Sun Tzu, underscoring the peril of lacking strategy.

The style is formal and analytical, beginning with polite addresses to the chairman and the rapporteur. The tone is concerned and urgent, focusing on the logical framing of the question regarding the existence of a contingency plan (Plan B) in connection with a critical security threat.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Minister directly. The tone is analytical, balancing recognition of the initiative ("pleased to see") with serious concern regarding the prevention of measure misuse. The appeal is logical and focuses on a procedural matter.