By Months: Meelis Kiili

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural. The discourse is logical and fact-based, focusing on reporting the proceedings of the Riigikogu and the decisions of the lead committee (dates, consensus). Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on the transparent description of the legislative process.

The rhetorical style is highly formal, procedural, and informative, typical of a presentation given by a commission representative to the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament). The tone is professional and neutral, relying primarily on facts, dates, and procedural decisions rather than emotional appeals. The speaker employs specific terminology (e.g., "blue helmets and blue berets," "Blue Line").

The style is highly formal, courteous, and respectful, addressing the Minister directly and offering thanks for the presentation. The rhetoric is inquiry-based and analytical, focusing on the comparison of strategic ambitions with neighboring countries. The tone is moderate and substantive.

The style is formal, methodical, and professional, utilizing the standard parliamentary address ("Mr. Speaker! Esteemed colleagues!"). The speaker balances recognition (by thanking the participants) and criticism (regarding bureaucratic incompetence), focusing on logical arguments and the search for solutions. The tone is analytical and purposeful, emphasizing the professionalism of the process.

The speaker's style is predominantly formal, businesslike, and procedural, especially when presenting the legislative process for a bill, where participants, dates, and proposed amendments are detailed. On strategic issues, the tone is authoritative and cautionary, employing logical arguments and references to strategic thinking (e.g., Sun Tzu). At the same time, there is an emphasis on seeking consensus and the best solutions, rather than mere compromise.

The speech is formal, respectful, and analytical, beginning with praise and thanks directed at the presenter. The rhetoric is logic-based, focusing on posing strategic questions and seeking counsel from the government and the Riigikogu. The tone is concerned, yet constructive, aiming to find solutions to the problem of evading Russian sanctions.