By Agendas: Meelis Kiili

The speaker demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of international peacekeeping operations, citing UN Resolutions (425 and 426), the UNIFIL area of operations (the Litani River and the Blue Line), and the composition of the participating nations. This expertise is supported by security situation overviews provided by officials from the Ministry of Defence and the General Staff of the Defence Forces.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of national defense, international conventions, and military strategy. This expertise is confirmed by a discussion regarding the role of landmines in deterrence and a reference to Sun Tzu's Art of War. He technically clarifies that withdrawing from the convention only grants the possibility, not the obligation, to utilize the weapons.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of national defense and security, utilizing technical terminology such as "adversary's intent, capabilities, and opportunities." He analyzes the law's effect on the Defense Forces' law enforcement and military measures, and refers to earlier legislative issues related to the merging of fleets.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in maritime security, international maritime law (UNCLOS Article 19), and legislative procedure. He/She accurately references the views of experts (e.g., Dr. Heiki Lindpere) regarding the lack of a continental shelf law and the need for legal protection of underwater infrastructure. Technical terms such as continental shelf, territorial sea, and normative technical specifications are used.

The speakers demonstrate knowledge in the field of national defense legislation and administrative organization, asking for clarifications regarding the type of legal acts (ministerial regulation vs. government regulation) and the composition of the reserve personnel. Speaker B, in particular, exhibits expertise concerning the civilianization of the Defense Forces' command structures and its long-term consequences. Technical terms such as "reservists" and "key functions" are utilized.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in national defense and legislative procedure, citing the viewpoints of the leaders of the Defence Forces and the Ministry of Defence. He/She is fully aware of the substantive necessity of the draft legislation (565 SE) for ensuring security and can accurately detail the procedural steps taken by the committee. This expertise is grounded in the relaying of official documents and committee discussions.

The speaker exhibits expertise in national defense and international peacekeeping operations, detailing the extent of Estonia’s contribution (up to three defense force members). His grasp of the Riigikogu’s procedural regulations is notably strong, citing specific legal provisions (Section 109) and committee workflows. He authoritatively presents a comprehensive overview of the bill’s legislative trajectory and timeline.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding international peacekeeping operations, particularly the history, mandate, and area of operations of UNIFIL. Specific data is utilized, such as the numbers of UN resolutions (425 and 426), the operation's location (the Blue Line), and statistics concerning participating nations. The speaker’s expertise is further confirmed by a reference to their personal participation in the same operation between 1996 and 1997.

The expertise clearly lies within the field of national defense and international security, especially regarding allied presence strategies. The speaker demonstrates knowledge of regional differences, citing the approaches of Poland, Lithuania, and Finland as comparative examples concerning the integration of allied families and their economies.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of national defense legislation and organizational management, serving as the lead processor of the draft bill. He/She methodically addresses fundamental issues concerning the financing of the Defense League (Kaitseliit) and the role of collegial bodies, employing the technical term "we staff equipment" as opposed to "we equip personnel." This expertise also extends to the understanding that management problems are resolved only through socially mature and competent senior executives.

The expertise is evident in the knowledge of the Riigikogu's procedural rules, especially concerning the initiation of draft legislation and the processing of amendments within various committees. The speaker employs specific parliamentary terminology ("the committee handling the matter," "the National Defence Committee") and focuses on juridical accuracy.

The speaker demonstrates profound knowledge of national defense legislation and procedural protocols, specifically highlighting amendments to the Defense League Act and the Weapons Act. He/She stresses the precision required in legal and normative drafting, noting the involvement of experts from multiple ministries (Defense, Interior, and Justice). This expertise is further evident in the details regarding technical drafting errors and linguistic ambiguities within the proposed bill.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of national defense and strategic planning, utilizing specific terminology (e.g., "broad approach," "six pillars," "security strategy"). This expertise is further highlighted by a reference to Sun Tzu, used to illustrate the supremacy of strategy over tactics.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the energy sector, mentioning the efficiency of market systems and interconnections. The focus is particularly strong on the security aspects of critical infrastructure and the analysis of attack threats stemming from the aggression of the eastern neighbor. The expertise centers on the intersection of energy and national defense.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in educational organization, drawing a distinction between basic education and primary schools, and referencing specific state support mechanisms. The specialized focus centers on the implementation details of these measures and the boundaries of local municipal responsibility.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of security structures, using specific threat definition terminology ("the adversary's intent, their capabilities, and the opportunities we present"). They also possess knowledge of international economic blocs (the BRIC format) and the practical challenges associated with implementing sanctions, highlighting Russia's capacity to evade sanctions.