By Agendas: Meelis Kiili

The style of cooperation is consensus-based and institutional. The National Defence Committee made a decision on the draft bill by consensus and worked closely with the Ministry of Defence and the General Staff of the Defence Forces, involving the minister and the colonels in the decision-making process.

The speaker refers approvingly to their colleagues who have already spoken in favor of the draft legislation, demonstrating collaboration within the faction or among the group of supporters. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise or any cross-party cooperation.

The speaker stresses the necessity of contributing to international legislation to restrict the opponent’s options. There is no data concerning domestic cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party collaboration.

The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive, emphasizing unanimity within the National Defence Committee regarding the completion of the second reading of the draft legislation. Close cooperation was maintained with the Ministry of Defence, copyeditors, and experts (e.g., Dr. Lindpere) during the preparation of the amendments and the coordination of the explanatory memorandum.

Speaker B refers to a previous dialogue with the waiter ("We have discussed this with you"), which demonstrates a readiness to discuss topics with colleagues. Simultaneously, there is a promise to propose an independent, comprehensive solution in the future, which indicates a readiness to initiate alternative legislative processes.

The speaker emphasized strong cooperation, both internally within the committee—noting the consensus decisions made in support of the draft bill—and with the executive branch. Cooperation with the Ministry of Defence and the Commander of the Defence Forces was essential during the discussion of the bill. The speaker indicated openness to compromises and amendments regarding the text of the draft bill for the second reading.

The style of cooperation is strongly consensus-driven, emphasizing that all decisions made by the National Defence Committee regarding the draft bill were reached "by consensus." This indicates successful cross-party cooperation on national defence issues and a willingness to achieve agreement.

The style of cooperation is consensus-based and inter-institutional, emphasizing the unanimous procedural decisions made by the National Defence Committee. Cooperation was carried out with the leadership and officials of the Ministry of Defence, as well as with the Foreign Affairs Committee, within the framework of a joint field session.

The style of cooperation is constructive and respectful, directing the question straight to the minister after listening to the presentation. The speaker's goal is the improvement and clarification of the strategy, utilizing a regional comparison.

The collaborative style is highly appreciative and constructive, highlighting the professional and methodical work carried out among the Defence League, the Ministry of Defence, and the National Defence Committee. The speaker stresses the importance of seeking solutions rather than compromises, although he notes that the funding amendment proposal did have "the flavor of a compromise." He specifically thanks all involved parties.

The collaborative style is dialogue-oriented, respectfully addressing the presenter and the chair/manager to resolve procedural ambiguity. It demonstrates readiness to address issues through open communication.

The style of cooperation is consensual and inclusive, emphasizing that the committee continues to strive for consensus on national defense issues and that the procedures were "cross-party." The speaker acknowledges successful cooperation with the Ministries of Defense, Interior, and Justice, who reached a mutual agreement on the wording of the new provisions. The objective was to find "the very best solutions," rather than simply compromises.

The collaborative style is open and constructive, recognizing the presenter's observations and ideas. The speaker refers to a prior in-depth discussion held with the presenter (Leo) himself, which demonstrates a willingness for meaningful cooperation and idea sharing with colleagues.

The collaborative approach is initially one of acknowledgment, expressing agreement with the presenter's views on the efficiency of large electricity grids. This is then followed by a constructive, yet critical question concerning security provision and the absence of specific plans.

Welcomes the minister's initiative to hold negotiations with local governments, demonstrating a readiness to support cooperation between the state and local authorities. The prerequisite for this cooperation is the responsible and targeted use of state measures.

The style of cooperation is open and constructive. The speaker thanks the rapporteur and presents their proposal as a recommendation to both the Government of the Republic and the Riigikogu, stressing the necessity of finding a shared inter-institutional strategy.