By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

The primary criticism is aimed at proponents of private health insurance, who are referred to as representatives of the "alternative school of thought." It criticizes their positions as deepening inequality, but does so based on arguments, avoiding personal attacks. It stresses that private health insurance is neither a "silver bullet" nor a "magic wand" for solving healthcare problems. The possibility of compromise is not entirely ruled out, but the author firmly advocates for the primacy of a solidarity-based system.

The speaker criticized the government's tax policy as unequal and favoring the wealthy, arguing that it deepens the societal divide. The critique was systemic and ideological, proposing a progressive income tax as an alternative.