Session Profile: Tanel Kiik
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
2025-05-20
Political Position
They criticized the government's tax policy as unjust, stressing that the rise in VAT hits low-income earners the hardest. They advocated for the introduction of a progressive income tax and voiced concern that the current tax system is widening social inequality.
Topic Expertise
He/She demonstrated a profound understanding of tax policy and its socio-economic implications. They used specific examples of the regressive nature of Value Added Tax (VAT) and compared the Estonian tax system with those of other European countries.
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs a question-driven, analytical approach, addressing the audience politely using the formal salutations "lugupeetud" (respected) and "austatud" (honored). The rhetoric is fact-based and detailed, utilizing specific figures (18% vs 8% impact on different income brackets) and comparative analysis. The tone is critical yet professional, expressing direct opposition to the government's policy through logical arguments and European-style comparisons.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Two questions concerning financial services and tax policy. The focus was on issues of regulation and the tax system.
Opposition Stance
He/She criticizes the government's tax policy, accusing them of creating a regressive system that disproportionately burdens low-income earners. They cite specific examples of the impact of the VAT increase on different income groups and demand a fairer tax policy.
Collaboration Style
They asked technical questions regarding payment institutions, focusing on understanding the regulations. They demonstrated a willingness to delve into the specifics of the legislation.
Regional Focus
He/She emphasized the impact of tax policy on different regions and income groups. He/She criticized the VAT increase as being the most painful for low-wage earners, who are more prevalent outside major cities.
Economic Views
He strongly criticized the government's tax policy, calling it regressive and unjust. He supported a progressive income tax, lowering the VAT on foodstuffs, and introducing wealth taxes. He argued that the current system increases inequality.
Social Issues
The speaker places a strong emphasis on issues of social justice, stressing the need to protect low-income individuals from the VAT increase. They support a progressive income tax as a fairer alternative and sharply criticize policies that disproportionately impact poorer citizens. They also highlight the necessity for a more equitable distribution of the tax burden between businesses and working people.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is actively involved in issues concerning financial services regulation, scrutinizing the differences between e-money institutions and payment institutions, as well as the associated risks. They also focus heavily on tax reform, acting as a sharp critic of the VAT increase while advocating for the implementation of a progressive income tax. Their approach to legislation is through detailed technical questions, examining the impact of regulations and potential risks.
2 Speeches Analyzed