Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Draft law amending the Unemployment Insurance Act and, in consequence thereof, amending other laws (519 SE) – third reading
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
We do not support the unemployment insurance reform bill, citing two primary reasons: the risks have not been adequately mitigated, and the government has abandoned tripartite negotiations concerning the labor market.
Topic Expertise
He/She demonstrated a profound understanding of the unemployment insurance system, explaining the reform's impact on students, parents, and family caregivers.
Rhetorical Style
A critical approach is taken towards government policy; the tone is concerned and demanding.
Activity Patterns
Criticism was raised regarding the unemployment insurance reform, specifically focusing on the failure to mitigate risks. Concern was also expressed about the quality of the engagement process.
Opposition Stance
He criticized the government’s unemployment insurance reform, accusing it of failing to mitigate risks. He argued that the engagement process did not comply with good practices.
Collaboration Style
He/She expressed clear opposition to the unemployment insurance reform, but justified this by citing the coalition's general political culture, rather than the content of the specific draft bill. He/She stressed the importance of the tradition of tripartite negotiations.
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
Economic Views
Insufficient data
Social Issues
Insufficient data
Legislative Focus
Did not support the unemployment insurance reform, criticizing the government for its inadequate consultation process. They stressed that such fundamental changes require broad consensus among labor market stakeholders.