Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Name Act and the State Fee Act (719 SE)
2025-10-22
XV Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The political stance focuses on protecting the legislation from criminal exploitation, stressing that changing one's name must not be an opportunity to conceal a criminal past. The position is primarily policy-driven, emphasizing the need to prevent unintended consequences of the draft bill and to reject the risk of simplifying life for offenders. This concern is both adequate and strong, addressing crimes against children as well as instances of fraud.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding mechanisms for the concealment of crime (particularly fraud and crimes against children), emphasizing the necessity of preventing the law from being used to perpetuate criminal acts. Furthermore, knowledge of the European Union legal framework is highlighted, prompting a comparison of name change practices in other member states.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is formal and respectful, addressing the Deputy Chairman and the Minister directly. The speaker employs logical argumentation to highlight adequate concern regarding the undesirable consequences of the draft legislation, while posing questions about the Minister's accountability. The tone is serious and concerned, but not confrontational.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in discussions on the bill, raising concerns that have been brought up both in the committee and on the floor. This indicates regular involvement at various stages of the legislative process.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct confrontation, but the criticism is directed towards the government or ministry, which must ensure that the draft bill does not simplify the lives of criminals. The criticism is rather proactive and policy-based, demanding additional analysis and consideration from the ministry.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker refers to concerns raised by other colleagues (several people) both in the committee and on the floor, demonstrating a willingness to rely on a broader consensus regarding the flaws in the draft bill. This shows an openness to cooperation in highlighting these concerns.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The emphasis is on international comparison, with the goal of ensuring that Estonia operates within the same cultural and operational space as the rest of the European Union member states. There is no specific local or regional focus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic positions are indirect, pointing to the necessity of preventing the commission of fraud by means of a name change, which suggests a desire to protect the economic order. No direct positions regarding taxes or the budget are presented.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among social issues, strong emphasis is placed on public safety and justice, particularly concerning crimes against children and fraud. The position is clearly directed towards preventing the lives of criminals from being made easier and ensuring the protection of society.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft act amending the Name Act and the State Fee Act (719 SE). The speaker's role is to critically assess the bill to ensure its compliance with the fight against crime and European Union practice, acting primarily as an advocate demanding the bill's improvement.
1 Speeches Analyzed