Agenda Profile: Tanel Kiik
Proposal of the Chancellor of Justice for bringing the Code of Civil Procedure into conformity with the Constitution
2024-06-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
Inquires about the impact of the Chancellor of Justice's proposal and supports it. Also asks how many people the change might affect annually.
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of the role of the Chancellor of Justice and the legislative procedure by specifically inquiring about the impact of the issue concerning compensation for destroyed vehicles. It also shows an understanding of the significance of the Chancellor of Justice's proposals for improving legislation.
Rhetorical Style
Employs technical questions and references to the commission's work, maintaining a formal and fact-based tone devoid of emotional bias.
Activity Patterns
He/She poses a specific question regarding the Chancellor of Justice's proposal, focusing on its practical impact. A brief, yet substantive contribution.
Opposition Stance
A neutral stance toward the Chancellor of Justice's proposal focuses on the practical question without offering direct criticism.
Collaboration Style
Presents a neutral question and indicates a willingness to support reasonable proposals. The style is collaborative.
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
Social Issues
The speaker strongly supports the amendments to the Health Services Organization Act, emphasizing the protection of patients' interests. These positions are clearly patient-centric, supporting increased competition in the pharmaceutical market. Health protection and patients' rights form the core of the argument.
Legislative Focus
The speaker strongly supports the amendments to the Health Care Services Organization Act. The approach is supportive and principled, emphasizing the protection of patients' interests. The legislative focus is on reforming healthcare policy.