By Plenary Sessions: Liina Kersna

The style is formal, analytical, and constructive, focusing on facts and procedures, especially the detailed reporting of the Culture Committee's discussion. The speaker uses logical arguments, while simultaneously emphasizing the vulnerability of the education system and the need to support teachers. The tone is generally supportive and solution-oriented, expressing thanks to those who have dared to go in front of the class.

The rhetorical style is optimistic, appreciative, and consensus-driven, underscoring the thoroughness and wide-ranging involvement inherent in the legislative process. The appeal is primarily logical and procedural, highlighting that the proposed amendments were voted on unanimously by the Culture Committee. The speaker repeatedly thanks colleagues, officials, and institutions for their constructive work.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, addressing both the chairman of the session and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The speech is logical and analytical, focusing on presenting concrete solutions (the creation of a research group) and future plans (joint sessions) in the form of a constructive question. Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is on procedural and substantive discussion.