By Plenary Sessions: Ester Karuse

The rhetorical style is urgent and serious, highlighting the lack of awareness among young people and parents, as well as the emotional exhaustion caused by unhealthy competition. Logical arguments are presented regarding the state's obligation to ensure compulsory schooling, but the tone remains compassionate and cautionary, stressing that the problem must be addressed "immediately."

The style is concerned and urgent, emphasizing both the practical (long journey) and moral aspects of the problem (the danger of scam calls targeting the elderly). It employs both logical arguments (banking profit figures versus social role) and emotional appeal. The address is formal and focuses on demanding accountability, seeking specific answers to the inquiry submitted three months earlier.

The rhetorical style is serious, concerned, and demanding, highlighting the critical and unhealthy nature of the situation. Both logical arguments (the consequences of losing services) and strong emotional appeals are employed, focusing on the well-being of the elderly, people with mobility issues, and stressed youth. The speaker utilizes the formal structure of an inquiry to keep the issues focused.