By Plenary Sessions: Ester Karuse

The speaker adopts a polite and respectful style, beginning by thanking the presenter for the comprehensive overview. The tone is one of concern (using the phrase "it weighs heavily on my mind"), yet remains constructive, proposing a logical and practical solution to the regional issue through education. A direct question format is employed to inquire about the institution's (the Bank of Estonia's) existing initiatives.

The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and interrogative, relying on the assumption of the presenter's expertise to introduce the subject. The tone is serious and demanding, seeking an explanation as to why the warring states have not been consulted regarding nuclear safety ("why this has not been done").

The rhetorical style is formal, serious, and concerned, emphasizing Estonia's role as a friend and ally of Georgia. The speaker balances historical context and logical arguments (referencing agreements and reforms) with emotional support for the "brave Georgian people."

The style is predominantly formal and logical, relying on facts and data (e.g., nine quarters). The economic speech is concerned and demanding, posing direct questions to the government regarding accountability. The foreign policy speech is unifying and declarative, emphasizing the common stance of the members of parliament.