By Plenary Sessions: Jaanus Karilaid

Demonstrates profound expertise in legislative procedures, focusing on the requirements for impact assessment (impact analysis) and instances of non-compliance. Detailed guidelines and control questionnaires (nearly 30 pages) from the Government Office and the Ministry of Justice are cited. Furthermore, they are familiar with the numerical data in specific budget forecasts and explanatory memoranda (e.g., 10 million vs 8.4 million).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in legislative procedures by demanding the disclosure of impact assessments and independent expert opinions (from the bar association and legal scholars). Detailed questions were also raised concerning state resources (human and budgetary resources) and statistics on the traffic of Russian-language websites. Crucially, emphasis was placed on the necessary competence and resources of the Administrative Court and the Competition Authority.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in local government financial matters (revenue base, investment climate) and administrative processes. Technical terms such as the State Shared Service Centre (RTK) and waste management are employed, alongside criticism of excessive bureaucracy. Specific awareness of regional financial disparities is highlighted, which is often distorted by data originating from Tallinn, Viimsi, and Rae municipalities.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of internal security, criminal law, and citizenship policy, citing a first-instance court ruling and the number of Russian citizens (approximately 90,000). They address the necessity of amending the constitution and relevant laws concerning the restriction of voting rights, and are aware of the bureaucratic hurdles imposed by Russia when individuals attempt to renounce their citizenship.