By Plenary Sessions: Madis Kallas

The style of cooperation is open and constructive, starting with praise and then presenting a specific question in light of a previous agreement. The goal is to find a solution and revert the ticket prices, which indicates a desire to cooperate constructively.

The speaker is participating in standard parliamentary procedure by submitting a question to the minister, demonstrating a readiness for formal dialogue and information gathering. There is no data available regarding broader cross-party cooperation.

The style of cooperation is highly appreciative and conciliatory, praising the Chancellor of Justice for their professional approach to people's concerns. The speaker calls for an open and clear discussion regarding regional differences, demonstrating a readiness for constructive cooperation within the Riigikogu chamber.

The speaker is highly cooperative, urging both the Ministry and the Riigikogu (Parliament) to join forces in discussing and finding solutions to reduce educational inequality. They promise a thoroughly substantive and peaceful discussion so that progress can be made on the issue collaboratively. Furthermore, there is interest in knowing whether regional wage disparities have been raised during meetings with the trade union.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by joining the previous speakers in praising the presenter. The approach is rather geared towards involving institutions, requesting the supervisory authority to use its influence to solve the social problem.

The speaker is collaborative, offering a solution (additional parliamentary control) that he believes would be beneficial to the Ministry of Defence, the Minister, and the Parliament. He asks the Minister for in-principle support for the solution, which indicates an openness to procedural cooperation.

There is not enough data. The speeches consist of questions posed to the ministers and criticism regarding previous policy; a willingness to cooperate is not evident.

The pattern of cooperation is clearly intra-party, as all the inquiries were submitted jointly with other members of the Social Democratic Party (6–7 signatures). In the third speech, a pragmatic approach is demonstrated, promising to withdraw the inquiry if the minister can resolve the concern using the budget data. There is no data available regarding cross-party cooperation.