Agenda Profile: Madis Kallas
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The political stance centers on the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of proceedings under the Competition Act. The speaker opposes the current solution, which mandates retaining two separate procedures (administrative and criminal), arguing that this dual track is both more costly and time-consuming. The position is heavily procedural, emphasizing the necessity of dispelling any doubts concerning business interests.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the procedural aspects of competition law, distinguishing between administrative and criminal proceedings. To substantiate their position, they rely on an expert assessment commissioned by the Economic Committee, which addressed the costs and complexity of the two separate proceedings. This knowledge is aimed at optimizing procedures and implementing the legislation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is polite and formal, including formal addresses and expressions of gratitude for the Minister's comprehensive responses. The speaker expresses regret (noting they are "sad") about the lack of a solution, but the appeal is primarily logical and procedural. They employ repeated questioning to demand clarification and justification regarding the continuation of a solution deemed ineffective.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The Speaker is actively engaged in the legislative debate, posing repeated and substantive questions to the Minister during the bill’s second reading. They participate in follow-up questioning that necessitates lengthy and detailed answers. Their pattern of activity demonstrates persistence in clarifying procedural details.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker objects to the procedural solution proposed by the government in the draft Competition Act. The criticism focuses on the procedure's inefficiency, high cost, and failure to alleviate concerns regarding conflicts of business interests. The opposition is demanding that the minister justify why they are moving forward with the more expensive and complex solution.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate, citing the expert assessment commissioned by the Economic Committee in support of their position. Communication with the minister is question-oriented and courteous, seeking rationale and explanations rather than direct confrontation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic views focus on regulatory efficiency and cost control in competition enforcement. Solutions that are cheaper and less time-consuming are preferred, and the need to avoid suspicions regarding commercial interests is emphasized.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on the draft Act amending the Competition Act (Bill 609 SE), specifically concerning the harmonization of procedures. The speaker is a critical questioner who, relying on expert opinions, seeks to steer the legislative process toward a more efficient resolution. The priority is simplifying procedures (preferring a single solution over two separate ones).
2 Speeches Analyzed