By Plenary Sessions: Raimond Kaljulaid

The rhetorical style is highly combative, sharply critical, and directly confrontational, utilizing strong expressions such as "it's not even fit under a cat's tail" and accusing opponents of pursuing the path of "legal nihilism." The speaker employs both logical argumentation (referencing explanatory memorandums and election platforms) and emotional appeals (the question of "manliness"). He uses political anecdotes (the changing of Tallinn's election rules) to discredit his opponents.

The style is initially formal and procedural, focusing on detailed reporting of the commission's work, including the reasoned rejection of proposed amendments. In the political rhetoric, the tone shifts to critical and slightly sarcastic, faulting the opposition for their minimal contribution to economic development and their focus on trivial details (the "gun cabinet vs. nightstand" issue). Appeals to logic are employed, stressing the economic advantages of deregulation.