By Plenary Sessions: Raimond Kaljulaid

The style is at times sharp and combative, accusing the opposition of populism, dishonesty, and shirking their duties. It employs both logical arguments (procedural details, the substance of legislative changes) and emotional appeals, stressing the importance of protecting the life and health of the Estonian people. The overall tone is formal yet passionate, particularly when criticizing opponents and urging them to engage in substantive work.

The style of speech is formal, procedural, and informative, characteristic of a commission rapporteur addressing the Riigikogu (Parliament). Emphasis is placed on logical argumentation and facts (referencing commission sessions and the consensus decision), while avoiding emotional appeals. The tone is businesslike, and a serious review of the proposed amendments is assured.

The rhetorical style is serious, pressing, and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and geopolitical threat analysis. Formal language and historical comparisons (such as Cold War-era spending) are used to underscore the gravity of the situation. The speaker presents their views in a structured manner, moving sequentially from defense expenditures to the geopolitical threat, financing, and concluding with institutional criticism.