By Plenary Sessions: Raimond Kaljulaid

The rhetorical style is predominantly formal, analytical, and principle-driven, focusing on finding balanced solutions. The speaker employs both personal commendation (congratulating the vice-chairman for an outstanding result) and strong moral criticism directed at the previous government's actions, labeling them "shameful" and "undignified." The argumentation is logic-based, stressing that the majority of people occupy various roles within traffic.

The style is formal, measured, and procedural, focusing on logical arguments and the correctness of the procedure. Repeated acknowledgment is utilized (the Prime Minister's leadership, the committee's sound selection), establishing a conciliatory and supportive tone. We are urged not to draw premature conclusions, but rather to weigh the arguments and await the outcome of the discussion.

The style is initially conciliatory and appreciative ("I sincerely acknowledge"), but subsequently shifts to critically analytical regarding the proposed solution. Strong figurative language is employed (the metaphor of lifting four tons of sand with a teaspoon) to emphasize the ineffectiveness of the opponent's draft bill. Irony is used at the conclusion, referencing the opposing side's reliance on the government's capacity for global problem-solving.